Tag Archives: google
Posted on 15. Jan, 2013 by Harvey Sax.
I don’t see the point in taking a needless loss. They should have made a larger size screen phone and I assume they will. When Google starts making a computer you really want to own then I’ll get worried but right now I don’t see how anyone can compete well with the whole Apple ecosystem. but then again there are a lot of people that don’t care that much about that but the counter to that is that the market itself is growing, Apple will innovate and at the multiple it’s trading at there is not much expectation for any growth at all. We’ll see but definitely a very painful trade now.
Posted on 24. Aug, 2012 by Harvey Sax.
“Our lawsuit is saying, ‘Google you f***ing ripped off the iPhone, wholesale ripped us off,’” Jobs said, according to Isaacson. “I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product.”
The verdict reached today will set the stage for Apple taking down Google in the biggest shoot down in tech history. It’s Google they’ve been after from the beginning and you can be sure the management of Apple is doing this and will do this for Steve as they should.
Posted on 15. Aug, 2012 by Harvey Sax.
I doubt if the two companies will settle and my guess is that it goes to the jury next week. If someone blinks, it will be Samsung. After all the trial is in Apple’s backyard and you know the last thing Steve Jobs would have said to Tim Cook was never settle this trial. I think copycat suits in technology are a hard thing to win. After all the mother of all copy cat suits was the first time Apple sued Microsoft for stealing the look and feel of the GUI. They lost that one. My guess is though the jury might have some nostalgia good feelings toward Apple and Steve Jobs and they just might win this one. If Apple wins, it will be an enormous loss for Samsung and an even greater one for Google. I think Google could lose a quick 10% or more. On the other hand, a loss for Apple would be a non event. I like the asymmetric nature of this setup. One strategy would be to buy puts on Google and calls on Apple. It’s a tough strategy because both have costly options. Longer term I think the damage between Apple and Samsung might be permanent and Samsung alternative suppliers might benefit from this.
Posted on 27. May, 2012 by Harvey Sax.
Facebook IPO Seen Deepening Investor Distrust Of Stocks
By Elizabeth Ody and Margaret Collins – May 25, 2012 10:01 PM MT
Facebook Inc. (FB)’s initial public offering, plagued by trading errors and a 16 percent drop in the share price, will push more individual investors out of a stock market they already distrust after the financial crisis.
“This is clearly the latest in a long string of events that is eviscerating the confidence investors have in the market,” said Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago attorney who represents retail investors. “The perception is Wall Street jiggered this IPO so the underwriters made money, Facebook executives made money and the small investor got left holding the bag.”
Ironically I feel pretty much the opposite of the headline. If the IPO worked well and crowd mania held sway, I’d say that the market is irrational and impossible to make money or predict correct behavior. Facebook is grossly over-valued as are all social media stocks. Technological obsolescence is so great in this industry, it’s hard to put long term growth rates on any business. Furthermore barriers to entry are low and behavior is fickle. Tomorrow’s disrupter is happening somewhere right now. The Internet, cloud, web, whatever is becoming balkanized. Facebook, Linkedin, Google +, iPhone, etc are all full steam ahead creating silos of users instead of the grand connected experience that advertisers are banking on Once they realize the web is mature in this country and soon most of the world, it’s growth rate won’t be much more than population rates and a fight for market share. This is not a high multiple growth business as the stocks indicated. They are all shorts, everyone of them.
Posted on 13. Apr, 2012 by Wilensky.
After hours and after earnings last night, Google (GOOG) announced a 2:1 share split. However the split has an ulterior motive other than reducing the cost per share, as Google’s co-founders are also looking to revamp the corporate structure as a result. With the split, a new share class will be formed other than the already existing Class A and Class B shares. This new class will trade under a different symbol but will retain all the rights of the previous two share types, including the ability to collect any future dividends. Here’s the catch though: ownership of these Class C shares retain no voting rights. This allows founders Brin and Page to issue more debt without diluting their control over the company. Over time, their ownership has dwindled down to just over 50% because of new issuance of Class A stock and the sale of their Class B shares (possessing a 10 vote per share premium). Since companies cannot issue shares with privileged voting rights after the fact, this new non-voting share class provides an opportunity to raise capital without giving up voting control. Keep an eye out for companies to follow suit and offer a non-voting share class.. this could become the new normal.
Posted on 19. Mar, 2012 by Wilensky.
Google just can’t seem to stay out of the spotlight in the arena of online privacy. Ever since they decided to “simplify” their online agreement, (see here, and here, and here) they have been scrutinized from every angle possible. Sure, the policies they had in place were convoluted and ineffective. Sure, they needed to play catch up on the data mining front to compete with the likes of Facebook. However, they managed to do so with the grace and precision of a hand grenade. This time around, the FTC is investigating to determine if Google intentionally tried to set a number of ad cookies through Safari’s browser in conjunction with violating consumer consent laws. Even if this ends well for Google, it won’t be the last time in the limelight..
We are looking for an ad agency, marketing group or individual with core competency in demographic, geographic, and retargeting online advertising.
Posted on 15. Mar, 2012 by Harvey Sax.
It’s astonishing how display ads have gotten so sophisticated. Did you know that when you look at a web site the ads that you see are probably only seen by you and the few hundred or thousand people most like you in the world? In fact they are designed to profile you, discover your aspirations, and type you, track you, follow you along the Web and drive you into someone’s sales funnel. I bet you never felt so wanted in your life.
In fact most of the gray matter IP, high-profile venture capital dollars are going into this very type of web investment. Forget the cure for Alzheimer’s. Its far more realistic and profitable to figure out what someone wants to do and spend their money on in the next five minutes than spending $500 million and a decade of time in an uncertain quest to aid human misery. The SAX ANGLE is looking for an ad agency, marketing group or individual with core competency in demographic, geographic, and retargeting online advertising. If you should know of such person or company, please forward this on to them. They will be very happy to have discovered us. Ask them to contact me personally at email@example.com.
Posted on 17. Feb, 2012 by Wilensky.
“Every popular web browser, save Opera Mini and the Android built-in browser, includes a “third-party cookie blocking” privacy feature. (The remainder of this post uses the term “cookie blocking” for brevity.) These options share a common high-level purpose: impose limits on cookies from “third-party domains,” that is, domains that differ from the “first-party domain” in the browser’s URL bar. In practice, however, implementations vary substantially; for (slightly out-of-date) specifics, see the Center for Democracy and Technology’s 2010 Browser Privacy Features report and Google’s Browser Security Handbook.”
Now Apple ships all of their web-ready devices with this feature already activated, which differs from all the other browser manufacturers. But according to the WSJ, Google used special computer code that tricks Safari’s software into allowing the monitoring of many users. Of course Google has an explanation for the blatant violation:
The spokeswoman acknowledged that Safari blocks third-party cookies by default, but said “Safari enables many Web features for its users that rely on third parties and third-party cookies, such as ‘Like’ buttons.” As a result, Google started using this functionality last year for Safari users who were signed in to Google and had opted to see personalized content – like Google’s +1 button.
“To enable these features, we created a temporary communication link between Safari browsers and Google’s servers, so that we could ascertain whether Safari users were also signed into Google, and had opted for this type of personalization,” the Google spokeswoman continued. “But we designed this so that the information passing between the user’s Safari browser and Google’s servers was anonymous – effectively creating a barrier between their personal information and the web content they browse.”
Safari, however, “contained functionality that then enabled other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser,” Google said. “We didn’t anticipate that this would happen, and we have now started removing these advertising cookies from Safari browsers.”
While Google’s actual intent is debatable, the company’s timing couldn’t have been more harmful to an already shaky level of public trust. One thing’s for sure though, this leaves the door wide open for Microsoft’s new version of Internet Explorer with the stinging slogan of ”the browser that respects your privacy”.
Posted on 09. Feb, 2012 by Wilensky.
Now I have to give Google credit, it’s the most user friendly privacy document I’ve seen to date; complete with unsophisticated illustrations that firmly reinforce it’s benign nature.
A caricature of how Google uses the information it gathers to improve the user experience.
Simplicity aside, what does this mean for the user? Well, as previously stated it’s a matter of perspective. Interestingly enough, the manner in which Google frames the changes immediately brought to mind a very specific phrase: “The Greater Good”. While a vast range of connotations are associated with these words, I feel they appropriately illustrate the multitude of grays that comprise the situation. In an effort to consolidate the experience, I provided excerpts of the policy below with some of the integral changes bolded. A link to the complete policy is also provided below.
Your data on Google
Knowing a little bit about you can help make Google products better, both for you and for others. By understanding your preferences we can ensure that we give you the search results that you’re looking for, and by analyzing the search logs of millions of users in aggregate, we can continually improve our search algorithm, develop new features, keep our systems secure and even predict the next flu outbreak.
When it comes to the way that we look after your data on Google, our approach is based on transparency, control and security.
We have five privacy principles that describe how we approach privacy and user information across all of our products:
- Use information to provide our users with valuable products and services.
- Develop products that reflect strong privacy standards and practices.
- Make the collection of personal information transparent.
- Give users meaningful choices to protect their privacy.
- Be a responsible steward of the information we hold.
Time limits on data retention
We anonymize IP addresses after 9 months and alter the cookie numbers in our logs permanently after 18 months. This breaks the link between the search query and the computer it was entered from and is similar to the way in which credit card receipts replace digits with hash marks to improve customer security.
Here is what an IP address could look like in our logs after 9 months:
123.45.67.XXX. After 18 months, the cookie will be replaced by a newly-generated cookie number.
Why we store search logs
We use search logs for many purposes, for example, to keep our services secure, develop new features that make search faster and more relevant, and even to predict outbreaks of disease.
The ads that appear on Google Search are targeted based on your search queries. If you type “cheap flights”, for example, into Google, you will probably see sponsored links at the top of the page and on the right hand side showing ads from travel companies. To decide which ad to show you, the automated system looks at the search query that you enter, the relevance of the ads to this query and how much the advertiser is prepared to pay in the auction and, in some cases, your very recent query history, amongst other factors. These are examples of contextual ads as they are related to what you are looking for on that page at that time.
In addition to the sponsored links you see on Search, Google places ads across the web by acting as an intermediary between advertisers and website owners. In some cases these are contextual like search ads, i.e. they are based on the content of the web page where they appear. In other cases they are interest-based ads and these are shown because we’ve made a guess at the types of things likely to interest you. We base this on other pages you’ve previously visited. So if you’ve visited many gardening sites, you may see more gardening ads across the web.
This is how it works:
- When you visit websites and watch videos where Google shows ads, we store a number in your browser by using a cookie to remember your visits. That number could be something like
- Because many of the websites you visit are related to gardening, we’ll put your number (
114411) in the “gardening enthusiast” interest category.
- So we may show you more ads that are relevant to gardening enthusiasts as you browse websites where Google provides ads.
Throughout this process we don’t store your name or keep any personal information about you. We just recognize the number stored in your browser, and show ads related to the interest categories associated with your cookie (so we’re recognizing your browser, not you). We don’t show ads based on sensitive information or interests, like race, religion, sexual orientation, health, or sensitive financial categories.
You can control which types of ads you see using Ads Preferences Manager. This allows you to change the interest categories associated with your browser (or if you don’t want us to store your interests at all, you can opt-out altogether).
Using Web History also means that you will get more personalized search results:
- Signed-in personalization:
- When you’re signed in to a Google Account with Web History, Google personalizes your search experience based on what you’ve searched for and which sites you’ve visited in the past.
- Signed-out personalization:
- When you’re not signed in, Google customizes your search experience based on past search information linked to your browser, using a cookie. Google stores up to 180 days of signed-out search activity linked to your browser’s cookie, including queries and results you click.
Imagine that somewhere in a remote place a man goes to Google and types in [fever]. Seconds later somebody nearby searches for [muscle ache]. And when more and more people from the same region start doing a similar search, it’s likely that something’s up.
Sometimes general patterns of search behavior match up closely to things happening in the offline world. When those correlations are strong, it can be possible to use spikes in a particular search to understand real-world behavior more quickly than traditional methods can notice a change. Using the aggregated searches of millions of people, we can help spot flu outbreaks or changes in economic conditions, giving professionals more time—and better information—to make decisions.
In 2008, we found that some search terms are good indicators of actual flu activity. It turns out that traditional flu surveillance systems take between one and two weeks to collect and release surveillance data. But Google search queries can be counted automatically very quickly. By making our flu estimates available each day, Google Flu Trends can provide an early-warning system for outbreaks of influenza. We have used the same insight to look at patterns of other diseases and have created an early warning system for dengue fever.
It’s important to remember that Google Flu Trends can never be used to identify individual users because we rely on anonymized, aggregated counts of how often certain search queries occur each week. We rely on millions of search queries over time, and the patterns we observe in the data are only meaningful across large populations of Google search users.
Ads Preferences Manager
Your interests are associated with an advertising cookie that’s stored in your browser. Using Ads Preferences Manager you can edit the categories associated with this cookie. For example, if you add “golf” to your interest categories you may now see more ads about golf. If you use a different browser or computer, your interest categories won’t carry over because they are specific to that cookie in that browser.
If you prefer, you can opt out altogether, and we will not store your interests. You will see the same number of ads as before, but they may not be as relevant.
If you prefer not to receive interest-based advertising in mobile applications and other clients that use an anonymous ID, you can opt out using the appropriate preferences manager.
So, do you feel better or worse?
Posted on 30. Jan, 2012 by Wilensky.
OK, the previous post on this topic generated a LOT of emails. With excessive use of the caps lock. All the shouting aside, the responses formed two very distinct camps: those who welcomed the changes with open arms, and those angered to the point that their accounts will be deactivated within the next month. This apartheid is primarily due to difference in perspective rather than an actual misrepresentation of facts. Let’s break down the two mindsets so we can understand both sides of the equation.
Now it is clear that purely from a functionality standpoint (ignore the politics for just a moment), the changes introduced by Google are in an effort to consolidate the rules governing a number of their different platforms with the user’s ease in mind. Google’s business plan is anything but linear; its development process is more akin to the behavior of a hyperactive eight year old who has been hiding his Adderall medication behind the couch. View this change as if Google is actually growing up a bit and organizing the cluttered, monumental mess of products that resembles their bedroom. I think you’ll be hard pressed to find a parent who isn’t delighted by this display of proactive behavior.
On the other hand Google is undoubtedly a company built on opportunity, which is illustrated through the behavior mentioned above. With so many side projects, acquisitions, and experimental programs, anyone would be hard pressed to successfully debate Google’s willingness to pursue a potentially favorable juncture of circumstances. And Google’s situation is exactly that: they now have the opportunity to try and play catch up in the data mining game pioneered by credit card companies and soon followed by social media sites.
My perspective on the situation lies somewhere in the midst of this rift. I believe Google’s intentions to first and foremost be benign. They wanted to consolidate an issue that plagues nearly every company with an overly convoluted privacy agreement. However, any public company is required to keep the shareholders’ best interests in mind, and this case was no exception. Google saw an opportunity to become more competitive and took it. Plain and simple.
An email by one of the readers spurred a bit of an idea which, combined with a dead iPod on the lift at Park City, gave birth to a little experiment that I’m going to try. In part 1 of this article, I mentioned that sites like Hotmail and Vimeo that have made no changes in how they protect your information will see a lot more of my traffic. But rather than ditch my Gmail account entirely I’m going to try and associate everything about my professional life with Google operated sites, while anything personal will stay with Hotmail, Vimeo, etc. By compartmentalizing the two aspects of life, theoretically the intrusiveness of Google’s new policy should become much clearer.
I’ll keep you posted…
Posted on 26. Jan, 2012 by Wilensky.
We’re getting rid of over 60 different privacy policies across Google and replacing them with one that’s a lot shorter and easier to read. Our new policy covers multiple products and features, reflecting our desire to create one beautifully simple and intuitive experience across Google.
These changes will take effect on March 1, 2012.
Now I prefer a perspective developed from several, unaffiliated angles.. especially when it comes to my privacy. So after a little digging I found some interesting feedback from some trustworthy sources:
Via: Washington Post:
Google said Tuesday it will follow the activities of users across e-mail, search, YouTube and other services, a shift in strategy that is expected to invite greater scrutiny of its privacy and competitive practices.
The information will enable Google to develop a fuller picture of how people use its growing empire of Web sites. Consumers will have no choice but to accept the changes.
The policy will take effect March 1 and will also impact Android mobile phone users, who are required to log in to Google accounts when they activate their phones.
Google plans on tracking you across almost every one of its products you use including Calendar, Docs, Gmail, search, and YouTube to give you better search results, more precisely targeted ads, and helpful schedule reminders. The new “features” are set to kick in March 1 when Google is condensing more than 70 disparate privacy policies for all its different products into one mega-policy.
As a result of the change, whenever you sign into your Google account, the search giant will treat you as a single user and collect your user information into one database. The end result will be “a simpler, more intuitive Google experience,” according to Google’s blog post announcing the change.
Take it for what it’s worth, but it appears Google is hard on Facebook’s heels when it comes to data mining. At least from my perspective, the scariest aspect of this new “privacy proposal” is two pronged: both the language and timing of this major change raises all sorts of alarms. Google waited just a month before the new policy goes into effect to alert users, and their choice of wording is far cry from both PCWorld and the Post’s interpretation of the changes.
Posted on 23. Jan, 2012 by Wilensky.
As I sit here typing out this post on my MacBook, occasionally running a question by Siri on my iPhone just for the heck of it, I can’t help but notice I’ve been blindsided by the Apple lifestyle… and I don’t seem to mind a bit. An iPod sits in my car, next to the two iPod shuffles that I take on the mountain when I ride, and I’m long Apple stock. My old HTC Incredible smartphone sits in a box, long forgotten. And I’m certainly not the only one to completely buy into the way of life that Steve Jobs envisioned; the iPhone 4s broke Apple sales records by 68% which, despite a very limited addition of new features, makes it the most successful product the company has ever released.
So how can anyone expect Google, with their scattered list of product endeavors and seemingly patchworked business model, to compete with this pre-packaged, sleek lifestyle that Jobs infuses into all his products? By looking at the numbers..
“Android is, quite simply, mind-boggling. 700,000 phones are lit up every day. And I’m pleased to announce 250 million Android devices in total, up 50 million since our last announcement just in November. In just 2 days over the holiday weekend, 3.7 million Androids were activated. And today, we’re announcing over 11 billion downloads from Android markets.”
“Google website revenue was up, in fact just shy of 30% year-over-year to $7.3 billion and 8% quarter-over-quarter with strength across most major geographies and verticals. Our Google Network revenue was up 15% year-over-year to $2.9 billion and 11% quarter-over-quarter.”
“Our other revenue was up 50% year-over-year to $410 million and 6% quarter-over-quarter. Our global aggregate paid click growth was very strong, up 34% year-over-year and 17% quarter-over-quarter. Our aggregate cost of click growth was down 8% year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter.”
For a more in-depth look see Zerohedge’s article here: Once Again, Market Action Group Think Fails To Comprehend Google’s Valuation | ZeroHedge.
Posted on 11. Dec, 2011 by Harvey Sax.
Judgment Day Looms for Apple, HTC
By IAN SHERR
Apple Inc.’s claims that some smartphones running Google Inc.’s Android software copy its inventions are approaching their first big judgment day in the U.S.
The International Trade Commission in Washington on Wednesday is expected to rule on whether some phones made by HTC Corp. violate Apple’s patents. The ruling could lead to a ban on handsets sold by the Taiwanese company, which uses the Android operating system and is the No. 3 smartphone provider in the U.S. market, according to research firm Nielsen.